GODDARD’S MESSAGE FOR STEUBENVILLE OHIO “GOD HELP YOUR SHITTY LITTLE TOWN”

LOCAL OHIO NEWSPAPER PUBLISHES ARTICLE WITH DETAILS REGARDING LAWSUIT AGAINST SANDRA GODDARD, OWNER AND OPERATOR OF PRINNIEFIED.COM

Yet another media outlet in Stubenville, Ohio has published an article regarding the Goddard lawsuit. In the article Goddard and 15 others who posted articles in her various forums are named as defendants.

http://www.hsconnect.com/page/content.detail/id/579636/Suit-filed-against-site-operator.html?nav=5010

To quote from the article:

“Cody Saltsman and his parents, James and Johna Saltsman, filed the lawsuit through their attorney, Shawn Blake, seeking an injunction to force Alexandria Goddard of Columbus, who runs the blog site prinniefied.com, to remove alleged false and defamatory statements from the blog site. The Saltsmans also are seeking monetary damages in excess of $25,000.”

To quote the article further:

“The lawsuit claims Goddard created several blogs on her Internet site regarding the sexual assault. The lawsuit also names 15 people as defendants by the fictitious names they created and registered on the blog.”

The article further states:

“The lawsuit contains postings that Blake claims are false and defamatory to the Saltsmans, including that Cody Saltsman was the “mastermind” and “orchestrator” of the sexual assault and also participated.

One posting from “HEARTSICK” states, “I think if the legal system does not get Cody, someone will take it upon themselves to ‘get him.'”

In a last quote from the article in regards to what the family seeks and attempts to contact Ms Goddard:

“The lawsuit also wants the court to issue an order forcing the defendants to post a retraction of all alleged false and defamatory statements published on Goddard’s blog, and for Goddard and other defendants to write an apology to be published in the newspaper and on local television. Goddard failed to respond to an e-mail requesting a comment on the lawsuit.”

It has been rumored that a national news network may begin to cover this lawsuit as more attention to the big red rape case story intensifies.

Stay tuned

MURT

DISGRUNTLED VICTIMS NOTIFYING ATTY REPRESENTING FAMILY SUING SANDRA GOODARD

The Gossiping Pens blog has tweeted that it is providing the atty representing the family suing Sandra Goddard and others, with information of Ms Goddards purported past actions of defamation and intimidation on the internet through the creation of smear blogs and multimedia material posted on youtube and elsewhere.

 

Stay tuned

 

MURT

COVERAGE CONTINUES IN THE LAWSUIT AGAINST SANDRA GODDARD

There has been a follow up story on the television outlet that broke the news that Sandra Goddard of Prinnified.com is being sued for comments and posts on her blog Prinnified.com

http://www.wtov9.com/news/news/local/defamation-lawsuit-filed-against-bloggers/nSr9S/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

It is now reported that damages are being sought in excess of $25,ooo. Also Sandra Goddard is being ordered to hand over the identity of those who made comments on her blog.

Shawn Blake, the lawyer for the teen and his parents, released this statement to NEWS9 on Tuesday:

“The Civil Case in Defamation that was filed last week in the Court of Common Pleas of Jefferson County is a case against Alexandria Goddard and other anonymous internet bloggers on Ms. Goddard’s website. Ms. Goddard and the anonymous bloggers have published numerous false and defamatory statements against my clients. Some of the statements included a call to acts of “street justice” against my clients. We are in the process of obtaining the identification of all of the internet bloggers, who used alias screen-names on Ms. Goddard’s website, in order to hold these individuals accountable for their false and defamatory statements. My clients are seeking a Court Order against Ms. Goddard to remove the false and defamatory statements on her website, as well as, a Permanent Injunction, which will prevent future false and defamatory statements from being made. In addition, my clients are seeking monetary damages for the false and defamatory statements made by Ms. Goddard and the bloggers on her website.”

 

Stay tuned

 

MURT

THE DEATH OF MA BARKER

SHE FOUGHT THE LAW AND THE LAW WON.

A post about a blogger being sued that used a picture of Ma Barker reminded me of when I used to drive a tour bus back in the 1990’s. One tour company I drove for passed a small unassuming house in a Florida town near Lake Weir. 

It is the house of Ma Barker who in the latter 30’s was shot dead along with her sons in a shootout with the FBI. Now what I am wondering is why would the blogger put up a picture of a woman who had the crap shot out of her because she defied the law?

Perhaps she is predicting the future?

Stay tuned

MURT

CASUALTY OF WAR

There has been a casualty of war of sorts. Someone has decided enough is enough and left the social media spectrum of the internet.

This is someone I consider a friend and others do not.

There will be those out there who will be happy at this departure and others will not. I am one of the latter. Nobody should be forced off a debate for the wrong reasons. In this case I feel that the person should not have left but that is beyond my ability to control. I wish that person the best of luck in the real world.

Stay tuned

 

MURT

FROM THE HEART OF A WARRIOR

SOMETIMES THE WORDS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES.

PRINNIFIED.COM BEING SUED IN RELATION TO BIG RED RAPE CASE

A comment sent to my blog cites a local tv blog as reporting that Sandra Goddard’s Prinnified blog is being sued due to false statements being made on her blog:

http://wap.wtov9.com/wap/news/text.jsp?sid=145&nid=1498460811&cid=12046&scid=-1&ith=1&title=Local+News&headtitle=Local+News

As some of you know, I have complained for YEARS that Sandra Goddard has a habit of making defamatory posts about me on the internet. I had also warned those on a Topix thread about this woman’s habit of defaming people on the internet. Now someone has finally had enough and has filed suit against her.

This is one case I will CERTAINLY be following.

THE DEATH OF MORGAN FREEMAN. AN EXAMPLE OF HOW FALSE RUMORS GET PERCEIVED AS THE TRUTH

I was watching a political ad narrated by Morgan Freemen when comments about his death came up in a conversation about the ad.

The problem is that Morgan Freeman is not dead.

I am not certain how this rumor started but even I was fooled by it until I came across his Facebook page where he addressed the rumor.

http://www.inquisitr.com/327229/morgan-freeman-dead-hoax-prompts-response-from-actors-rep-fools-countless-people-on-the-internet/

This story takes me back yet again to one certain blog that insists on making up stories about me and others that are simply not true. The problem is that her followers contribute to these stories by posting events and so called facts that are simply not true. For what must purely be for the purpose of driving up visitor numbers to her blog, the owner of the blog allows these comments to go through the screening process that she has full control over for all to read.

I suppose these actions by the blogger in question  can now be called “The Morgan Freeman Death Hoax Syndrome”

Stay tuned

 

MURT

CASE LAW. HOW A HEARING IN MINNESOTA MAY CHANGE THE COURSE OF DEALING WITH INTERNET CYBERBULLYING OR THE QUEST FOR THE TRUTH IN HIGH PROFILE CASES BEING DEBATED ON THE INTERNET

A hearing in Minnesota may have set a legal landmark or legal precedent . On one side it is an example how, if someone has the resources to do so, they can deal with those who insist on posting false and inappropriate content about them and conduct certain acts of harassment in the process.

On the other side, there may have been a blow to the first amendment when it comes to criticizing those with the resources to quell the criticism.

 

There are two camps in regards to the actions of Tim Holmseth. One camp believes that he is an out of control conspiracy theoriest who libeled and terrorized people on the internet. One of those he allegedly did this to happened to be a lawyer, and a powerful one at that.  This lawyer was able to do something about him, and did.

The other camp believes that Mr Holmseth was a crusader who was trying to bring out the truth surrounding the case of a missing Florida child. This camp may argue that it was the power and resources the atty had at her disposal to quash the truth.

There is likely going to be a debate about what occurred in the courthouse in Polk County Minnesota. There has been one result. Mr Holmseth has been placed on one year of probation and has been ordered to remove all content regarding the atty and her family.

This is good news for the atty and her family, Is it good news for the on line community at large? Only time will tell.

THOSE OF US WHO HAVE BEEN TORMENTED BY BLOGGERS ON THE INTERNET NOW HAVE ANOTHER CASE WE CAN CITE IN OUR FIGHT FOR JUSTICE

For those of us who have been tormented on the internet it gives us hope that perhaps someday we will get the justice we seek and the false and misleading material that cyber abusers post on the internet may soon be removed.

For those who feel they have been trying to seek justice and the truth, they will feel that this may have been a blow to their cause.

Now, let the debate begin. In some circles, it already has.

 

Stay tuned

 

MURT

 

{m

Next Page »