anonintWhen I got the link from a well known member of Anonymous, I should have realized that I was walking straight into a trap that reminded me of the great German Porn star hoax.

I am not going to go into detail regarding this little stunt other than to say it says a lot about the character of the Blogger that allowed this hoax to go forward. If not for a well known “individual” from Ohio and a couple of others from that secret blog, I never would have known the true nature of the stunt that blogger allowed to go forth.

The latest hoax of this nature, this time involving a drone, took advantage of my trusting nature and my willingness to help someone who seemed to have been the victim of a stalker.

Brother was I fooled. I was sent an e-mail from a member of Anonymous that had been in contact with me before that had a link to a twitter post having to do with a woman wanting to know the purpose of a drone in her back yard.



Not realizing that I was being set up for a fall, I went to the twitter link and examined the photo of the drone. I then went to the website of the woman and found her e-mail address. I sent the woman an e-mail(see above) explaining what it is that was in the photograph and my advice as to what to do about it.

Shortly thereafter I was sent a rather terse reply from the woman saying that “I am not going to get MY drone back.” and not to contact her again, anywhere.

I thought nothing of this and went about my business until I suddenly began getting flooded with e-mails regarding this woman and how she has done things like this before. Some of these messages went into great detail about her obsession with an unknown stalker that was after her over an unsolved crime she was following out of Long Island.

One of these e-mails also informed me that I had been set up and detailed how and by whom.

It started with someone seeing these photographs on my twitter page. It seems that the person had posted a photo of a drone she claimed was in her back yard. This person asked Anonymous, through another individual, to see if they could figure out what the thing was and what it was used for.

The Anonymous person told me that it was the photos from my twitter account that gave the person the idea to pull off this elaborate hoax, with some help.


I was also told by several sources that this person is an alleged liar that has pulled stunts of this nature before out of a need for constant attention and wanting to be perceived as super important.

I do not know if any of these accusations are true or if the drone in the photo is even a true representation of what happened to her or just a random photo she pulled off the internet in order to pull off this little hoax.

It is  interesting to note to anyone who looks up her twitter page regarding that thing these points. The drone is inoperative. The propellers are broken. A substantial amount of hardware is missing off of the drone.

It is my opinion that the drone pictured is probably a child’s toy used as a prop for an elaborate hoax at my expense. It is a piece of junk incapable of doing nothing except being a prop.

This is the price I paid trying to help someone and it is also a lesson learned. I will never, ever will try and help ANYONE from Anonymous again or anyone affiliated with them.

Stay tuned



  • Linda says:

    Murt, that woman who calls herself Mystermom7 is a con artist. There is something wrong with her. I have friend who lost a family member to a serial killer. Mystermom7 has been harrasing my friend as well as the family members of several other victims of the serial killer. Also, every time a long island girl runs away or is missing for even a day, this whack job is frightening the families of those girls by making them think that their loved ones are also victims (then they show up in a day or two alive and well) and she never gives one appology.

    She has accused and stalked an innocent doctor. I don’t even know if the doctor is aware that she is stalking him. His name is Dr. Charles Peter Hackett and she fabricates stories about him every day on her blog.

    She takes everything too far. Her arrest was because she burned her husband with a cigarette in front of her child because he was out late with his friends playing poker and hanging out with strippers.

    She has admitted to calling a writer at his job and harrasing him accusing him of assisting the Long Island serial killers.

    She called me and others I know and sent each of us emails asking her to assist with her campaign to put you in jail for stalking her. She is convinced that you have a daughter who resides in West Babylon, NY who moved there from Purchase colleage. Is that true?

    Have you ever really been to her house?

    Is the drone yours?

    What about her wire taps? Is that you?

    • Linda:
      I have been getting all kinds of messages and e mails about this woman. I had no idea trying to answer a simple question would have caused such an uproar.
      I Will now answer the three questions you have at the end of your comment:
      No, I have never been to her house. Prior to her posting the question about the drone, I did not know the woman existed.
      Second answer: No the drone is not mine. I do not own a drone. I have knowledge of those things and know what they are capable of. That is why I e-mailed her with the answer to her question.
      Third: I did not do wire taps of anyone. I do not know how and would not do so if I knew how since it is illegal and carries stiff jail time and fines.
      Final answer. I do not have a daughter and never had a daughter. I only had one child, a son who passed away in the summer of 2000. My wife passed away in 2008 and I am widowed.

      I am still confused how this woman thinks I have even the remotest connection to the LISK case. Other than the same 48 hour segment she saw, I have no knowledge of the case and have never been in contact with anyone even remotely connected to it.


Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>